On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 05:46:48PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> D1 (aka D1-H), D1s (aka F133), R528, and T113 are a family of SoCs based
> on a single die, or at a pair of dies derived from the same design.
>
> D1 and D1s contain a single T-HEAD Xuantie C906 CPU, whereas R528 and
> T113 contain a pair of Cortex-A7's.
Is this "additionally contain" or a case of the D1 is the R528 but with
s/arm/riscv/? It's the latter, right?
> D1 and R528 are the full version of
> the chip with a BGA package, whereas D1s and T113 are low-pin-count QFP
> variants.
>
> Because the original design supported both ARM and RISC-V CPUs, some
> peripherals are duplicated. In addition, all variants except D1s contain
> a HiFi 4 DSP with its own set of peripherals.
>
> The devicetrees are organized to minimize duplication:
> - Common perhiperals are described in sunxi-d1s-t113.dtsi
> - DSP-related peripherals are described in sunxi-d1-t113.dtsi
> - RISC-V specific hardware is described in sun20i-d1s.dtsi
> - Functionality unique to the D1 variant is described in sun20i-d1.dtsi
>
> The SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ macro handles the different #interrupt-cells
> values between the ARM (GIC) and RISC-V (PLIC) versions of the SoC.
Modulo the warnings I replied to the cover with & one minor comment
below:
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Split into separate files for sharing with D1s/R528/T113
> - Use SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ macro for interrupts
> - Rename osc24M to dcxo and move the frequency to the board DTs
> - Drop analog LDOs due to the missing binding
> - Correct tcon_top DSI clock reference
> - Add DMIC, DSI controller, and DPHY (bindings are in linux-next)
> - Add CPU OPP table
>
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/sun20i-d1.dtsi | 66 ++
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/sun20i-d1s.dtsi | 76 ++
> .../boot/dts/allwinner/sunxi-d1-t113.dtsi | 15 +
> .../boot/dts/allwinner/sunxi-d1s-t113.dtsi | 844 ++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 1001 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/sun20i-d1.dtsi
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/sun20i-d1s.dtsi
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/sunxi-d1-t113.dtsi
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/sunxi-d1s-t113.dtsi
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/sunxi-d1s-t113.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/sunxi-d1s-t113.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c8815cbf0b46
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/allwinner/sunxi-d1s-t113.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,844 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ or MIT)
> +// Copyright (C) 2021-2022 Samuel Holland <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/sun6i-rtc.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/sun8i-de2.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/sun8i-tcon-top.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/sun20i-d1-ccu.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/sun20i-d1-r-ccu.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/sun8i-de2.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/sun20i-d1-ccu.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/sun20i-d1-r-ccu.h>
> +
> +/ {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> +
> + dcxo: dcxo-clk {
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + /* This value must be overridden by the board */
> + clock-frequency = <0>;
Since this is a "must", can you drop the clock-frequency = <0> here so
that if someone doesn't override it in their board dt-validate
complains?
Thanks,
Conor.
> + clock-output-names = "dcxo";
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
