On 25/11/2022 15:32, Sriranjani P wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: 25 November 2022 16:52 >> To: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; > Krzysztof >> Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Alim Akhtar >> <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-samsung- >> soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sriranjani P >> <sriranjani.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Chanho Park <chanho61.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>; >> Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: exynos-sysreg: split from >> syscon >> >> Split Samsung Exynos SoC SYSREG bindings to own file to narrow the > bindings >> and do not allow other parts of syscon.yaml. This allows further > customization >> of Samsung SoC bindings. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> --- >> >> Cc: Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- > > We agree for add separate YAML for Samsung Exynos and hence I think we can > go ahead and add separate yaml for Tesla FSD. > Reviewed-by: Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@xxxxxxxxxxx> Tesla FSD should go to the same file. No need for another binding for same design... Best regards, Krzysztof
