On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:01:28 +0800, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 09:17:12AM +0800, Hal Feng wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..c22e8f1d2640
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
> > @@ -0,0 +1,437 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR MIT
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2022 StarFive Technology Co., Ltd.
> > + * Copyright (C) 2022 Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx>
>
> @Emil, I feel like I have to ask given the 2022 date, but should this
> stuff be attributed to your canonical address or is this fine?
>
> Other than that, a cursory check /looks/ fine, other than the:
>
> > + gmac0_rgmii_rxin: gmac0_rgmii_rxin {
> > + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > + #clock-cells = <0>;
> > + /* This value must be overridden by the board */
> > + clock-frequency = <0>;
> > + };
>
> If you remove the clock-frequency = <0> bit, dtb validation will force
> people to set the value in jh7110-board.dts which I'd prefer to rely on
> than a comment.
Okay, will remove the `clock-frequency = <0>` in this file.
Best regards,
Hal
