于 2022年11月22日 GMT+08:00 下午3:35:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> 写到: >On 22/11/2022 08:18, Icenowy Zheng wrote: >> 在 2022-11-21星期一的 11:06 +0100，Krzysztof Kozlowski写道： >>> On 21/11/2022 05:17, Icenowy Zheng wrote: >>>> T-Head OpenC906 is a open-source-licensed fixed-configuration of >>>> C906, >>>> which is now public and able to be integrated. >>>> >>>> Add a compatible for the CLINT shipped as part of OpenC906, which >>>> should >>>> just be ordinary C9xx CLINT. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/sifive,clint.yaml | 1 + >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git >>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/sifive,clint.yaml >>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/sifive,clint.yaml >>>> index aada6957216c..86703e995e31 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/sifive,clint.yaml >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/sifive,clint.yaml >>>> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ properties: >>>> - const: sifive,clint0 >>>> - items: >>>> - enum: >>>> + - thead,openc906-clint >>>> - allwinner,sun20i-d1-clint >>> >>> Add entries sorted alphabetically. This should be squashed with >>> previous >>> patch. >> >> I make it a seperated patch because I think it's a questionable >> approach. >> >> If you think it's okay, I will just squash it and put it as the second >> patch in the next iteration, with adding openc906-plic as the first >> one. > >What is a questionable approach? Why commit msg is not saying this? Ah I mentioned it in the cover letter. The problem is just I doubt whether binding strings for single SoCs are necessary. > >Best regards, >Krzysztof >
