On 22/11/2022 08:18, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > 在 2022-11-21星期一的 11:06 +0100，Krzysztof Kozlowski写道： >> On 21/11/2022 05:17, Icenowy Zheng wrote: >>> T-Head OpenC906 is a open-source-licensed fixed-configuration of >>> C906, >>> which is now public and able to be integrated. >>> >>> Add a compatible for the CLINT shipped as part of OpenC906, which >>> should >>> just be ordinary C9xx CLINT. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/sifive,clint.yaml | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git >>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/sifive,clint.yaml >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/sifive,clint.yaml >>> index aada6957216c..86703e995e31 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/sifive,clint.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/sifive,clint.yaml >>> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ properties: >>> - const: sifive,clint0 >>> - items: >>> - enum: >>> + - thead,openc906-clint >>> - allwinner,sun20i-d1-clint >> >> Add entries sorted alphabetically. This should be squashed with >> previous >> patch. > > I make it a seperated patch because I think it's a questionable > approach. > > If you think it's okay, I will just squash it and put it as the second > patch in the next iteration, with adding openc906-plic as the first > one. What is a questionable approach? Why commit msg is not saying this? Best regards, Krzysztof
