On 21/11/2022 11:45, Edmund Berenson wrote: >>>> I would expect lower number as fallback. >>> If I remove alone compatibility of 7924 and 7927 in the documentation, >> >> I don't understand. 7924 and 7927 are not compatible with each other - >> neither in old code nor in new - so what do you want to remove? >> >>> I will have to remove explicit compatibility match on the driver side, >>> correct? >>> Just want to make sure I don't misunderstand you. >> >> My comment to which you responded was about order of items. Usually >> lower number means older device and usually older device is the fallback. > My response was meant to respond to both your comment to "deprecate > alone compatibility" and "lower number should be fallback" > Which I understood in the following way: because 7923, 7924 for one and > 7927, 7928 are compatible with each other I will remove > 7924 compatible string from driver and not add 7927 to the driver and > only add it to the documentation. That's not what I suggested. I said nothing about driver, I did not even look there. I *only* asked to mark old variants as "deprecated: true". Not remove anything from drivers as this would be obvious ABI break. Best regards, Krzysztof
