Hey Emil/Hal,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 09:17:11AM +0800, Hal Feng wrote:
> From: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx>
>
> This adds support for the StarFive JH7110 SoC which also
> features this SiFive cache controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs | 1 +
> drivers/soc/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/soc/sifive/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
> index 69774bb362d6..5a40e05f8cab 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ config SOC_STARFIVE
> bool "StarFive SoCs"
> select PINCTRL
> select RESET_CONTROLLER
> + select SIFIVE_CCACHE
Please no. I am trying to get rid of these selects + I cannot figure out
why this driver is so important that you *need* to select it. Surely the
SoC is useable without it?
Is this a hang over from your vendor tree that uses the driver to do
non-coherent stuff for the jh7100?
> select SIFIVE_PLIC
> help
> This enables support for StarFive SoC platform hardware.
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/Makefile b/drivers/soc/Makefile
> index 69ba6508cf2c..534669840858 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/Makefile
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ obj-y += qcom/
> obj-y += renesas/
> obj-y += rockchip/
> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_SAMSUNG) += samsung/
> -obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_SIFIVE) += sifive/
> +obj-y += sifive/
This bit is fine.
> obj-y += sunxi/
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA) += tegra/
> obj-y += ti/
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/sifive/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/sifive/Kconfig
> index ed4c571f8771..e86870be34c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/sifive/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/soc/sifive/Kconfig
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> -if SOC_SIFIVE
> +if SOC_SIFIVE || SOC_STARFIVE
As I suppose is this - but hardly scalable. I suppose it doesn't really
matter.
> config SIFIVE_CCACHE
> bool "Sifive Composable Cache controller"
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c b/drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c
> index 1c171150e878..9489d1a90fbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c
> @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id sifive_ccache_ids[] = {
> { .compatible = "sifive,fu540-c000-ccache" },
> { .compatible = "sifive,fu740-c000-ccache" },
> { .compatible = "sifive,ccache0" },
> + { .compatible = "starfive,jh7110-ccache" },
Per my second reply to the previous patch, I am not sure why you do not
just have a fallback compatible in the binding/dt for the fu740 ccache
since you appear to have identical configuration?
Thanks,
Conor.
