For the benefit of everyone else: I screwed up a reply from mobile and ended up with a brief exchange offline, but here's the useful part of the context. Viresh also pointed out dropping opp-shared if we don't use that mechanism, so I'll do that for v4. On 14/11/2022 16.03, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 14-11-22, 15:57, Hector Martin wrote: >> There is no way to express this relationship with OPP tables without >> duplicating the tables themselves. > > Can you show how the DT looks in this case ? I am still not clear on what the > scenario is here :( Here's the most complicated one we have so far: 20 cores and 6 clusters sharing 2 OPP tables (mind the include and define fun - this is the best way we could come up with to express two SoC dies glued together into one MCM). https://github.com/AsahiLinux/linux/blob/asahi-wip/arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t6002.dtsi - Hector
