On 14-11-22, 15:57, Hector Martin wrote: > I don't think you understood me. We have multiple identical clusters. > All those clusters share an OPP table but are *not* the same cpufreq > domain. So we can have 8 CPUs which are two 4-CPU cluster using one OPP > table. I looked at the patch 5/5. It shows two clusters, e and p, with four CPUs in each cluster. And as per the OPP table all the CPUs in cluster e are part of same frequency domain, i.e. switch rate together. Same with all CPUs of cluster p. And I also see both the clusters have separate OPP tables. > There is no way to express this relationship with OPP tables without > duplicating the tables themselves. Can you show how the DT looks in this case ? I am still not clear on what the scenario is here :( -- viresh
