On Mon, Oct 27 2014 at 03:15 -0600, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
Hi Ivan,
Hi Lina,
On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 17:40 -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
Changes since v8:
[ https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg11473.html ]
- Flatten out the file structure - merge pm.c into spm.c after discussions
- Add a new function to set warm boot address, in scm-boot.c
- Support for 8064 (New)
- Tested on 8074, 8084. 8064 was tested with a WIP tree
- Address review comments from v8
- Looking into possiblility of initializing the cpuidle device for a cpu,
only when the corresponding spm device is probed successfully.
And this is based on...? Please, could you be explicit what kind
of patches are needed before applying this patch set. Is seems
that they don't depend just on "Lorenzo's ARM idle-states patches",
I see patches from Stephen Boyd, Olav Haugan and Vikram Mulukutla
in your tree.
You need these series of patches -
1. Lorenzo's ARM common idle states
2. Stephen Boyd's SCM update series -
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/4/767
3. My SCM patches updating Stephen's (that I believe Kumar pulled in) -
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-arm-msm/msg10799.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-arm-msm/msg10795.html
Thanks,
Lina
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
