Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] cpuidle driver for QCOM SoCs: 8064, 8074, 8084

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Lina,

On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 17:40 -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> Changes since v8:
> [ https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg11473.html ]
> - Flatten out the file structure - merge pm.c into spm.c after discussions
> - Add a new function to set warm boot address, in scm-boot.c
> - Support for 8064 (New)
> - Tested on 8074, 8084. 8064 was tested with a WIP tree
> - Address review comments from v8
> - Looking into possiblility of  initializing the cpuidle device for a cpu,
> only when the corresponding spm device is probed successfully.
> 
> 

And this is based on...? Please, could you be explicit what kind
of patches are needed before applying this patch set. Is seems
that they don't depend just on "Lorenzo's ARM idle-states patches",
I see patches from Stephen Boyd, Olav Haugan and Vikram Mulukutla
in your tree.

Regards,
Ivan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux