On 03/11/2022 11:31, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 11/3/2022 3:24 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> String "nand" was never a valid interrupt name. It was never documented
>> and never used in Linux or U-Boot driver. It most likely comes from a
>> copy & paste mistake ("nand" is used in "reg-names").
>>
>> The whole "interrupt-names" property is optional and can be skipped.
>
> How about we just fix the binding document instead? Deciding the fate of
> a property based upon client programs of the DTS using it is a weak
> argument IMHO.
Having a "names" property with only one item and the name matching the
device name is also not useful.
For new bindings the recommendation would be: drop the interrupt-names.
For existing bindings - choose something reasonable, e.g. less changes
needed.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
