On Sat, 08 Oct 2022, Colin Foster wrote: > The *_RES_SIZE macros are initally <= 0x100. Future resource sizes will be > upwards of 0x200000 in size. > > To keep things clean, fully align the RES_SIZE macros to 32-bit to do > nothing more than make the code more consistent. > > Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > v3-v4 > * No change > > v2 > * New patch - broken out from a different one > > --- > drivers/mfd/ocelot-core.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) I'm guessing some of the other patches depend on this? How should it be handled? For my own reference (apply this as-is to your sign-off block): Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
