On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 07:27:09AM -0400, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 28/10/2022 05:33, Jon Hunter wrote: > >>> + ucsi_ccg: ucsi_ccg@8 { > >> > >> No underscores in node names. > >> > >>> + compatible = "cypress,cypd4226"; > >>> + cypress,firmware-build = "gn"; > >>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio>; > >>> + interrupts = <TEGRA234_MAIN_GPIO(Y, 4) IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; > >>> + reg = <0x08>; > >>> + status = "okay"; > >> > >> The pattern of redefining full path in Tegra is confusing - I have no > >> clue which of these status=okay are correct which are redundant. > >> > >> Do you? > > > > I understand you may not like this approach, however, this comment is > > not really relevant to just this patch, but a general comment. But yes > > we will ensure that this is correct. > > > > Just to clarify - this status looks redundant, but I have no way to tell > for sure... But that's independent of whether we specify this using the full path or reference the node by label, isn't it? The only way to make sure that a status = "okay" is not redundant is by manual inspection. I don't know of an automated way to do that. Perhaps it's something that could be added as a check to DTC? In this particular case I don't think the status is needed. As Jon mentioned, this device is first defined here and status = "okay" is the default, so this is redundant. Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature