On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 1:46 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:00:34PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Shubhrajyoti,
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 12:41 PM Shubhrajyoti Datta
> > <shubhrajyoti.datta@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 35a4bc94a47f2ea6 ("gpio:
> > pca9570: add a platform data structure") in gpio/gpio/for-next
> > linux-next/master next-20221026
>
> Dunno if Bart rebases his tree...
>
I will back it out of next. Shubhrajyoti: can you send a fixed version
of this series?
Bart
> ...
>
> > > static const struct of_device_id pca9570_of_match_table[] = {
> > > - { .compatible = "nxp,pca9570", .data = (void *)4 },
> > > - { .compatible = "nxp,pca9571", .data = (void *)8 },
> > > + { .compatible = "nxp,pca9570", .data = &pca9570_gpio },
> > > + { .compatible = "nxp,pca9571", .data = &pca9571_gpio },
> >
> > This breaks bisection, as .data is still considered to be the number
> > of GPIOs:
> >
> > gpio->chip.ngpio = (uintptr_t)device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
>
> You beat me up to it, I have also noticed this.
>
> > > { /* sentinel */ }
> > > };
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
