Hi Amjad,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 4:03 PM Amjad Ouled-Ameur
<aouledameur@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl.dtsi
> index c3ac531c4f84..04e9d0f1bde0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl.dtsi
> @@ -429,6 +429,20 @@ mux {
> };
> };
>
> + spi_idle_high_pins: spi-idle-high-pins {
> + mux {
> + groups = "spi_sclk";
> + bias-pull-up;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + spi_idle_low_pins: spi-idle-low-pins {
> + mux {
> + groups = "spi_sclk";
> + bias-pull-down;
> + };
> + };
> +
We typically have the .dts{,i} changes in a separate patch. I suggest
doing the same here.
I also have two questions about this part:
- why are these not referenced by the SPICC controller node?
- is there a particular reason why meson-gxl.dtsi is updated but
meson-gxbb.dtsi is not? (my understanding is that GXBB is also lacking
hardware OEN support)
Best regards,
Martin
