Even thought sys_nirq1 is hardwired on the SoC for the pin, it is
better to configure the pin to the required mux configuration.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm.dts | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm.dts
index 4107428..671e473 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm.dts
@@ -26,6 +26,12 @@
0x404 (PIN_INPUT | MUX_MODE0) /* i2c1_scl.i2c1_scl */
>;
};
+
+ tps65917_pins_default: tps65917_pins_default {
+ pinctrl-single,pins = <
+ 0x424 (PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE1) /* wakeup3.sys_nirq1 */
+ >;
+ };
};
&i2c1 {
@@ -38,6 +44,9 @@
compatible = "ti,tps65917";
reg = <0x58>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&tps65917_pins_default>;
+
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 2 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>; /* IRQ_SYS_1N */
interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
interrupt-controller;
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
