On 20 October 2014 11:20, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:16:16AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> On 20/10/14 09:46, Neil Zhang wrote: >> > Will, I prefer to check always-on field under PMU node to check >> > whether we need Save/restore them. >> > >> But how do you handle it for different idle states. e.g. if CPU is in >> retention, PMU's *might be* retained. Also I don't think PMUs will be >> placed in "always-on" power domain like timers. So using "always-on" >> sounds incorrect to me. > > Adding Mathieu to CC, since I spoke to him at LPC about this and he was > talking about implementing proper PM domain descriptions for coresight > components. > > Will Will is correct - it's in the pipeline now. Just hang tight. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
