On 10/10/2022 12:43, Dzmitry Sankouski wrote: > (...) >> >> Why do you have DTSI for one DTS? > Samsung has several devices on sdm845 SoC (at least 3 phones: > starqltechn, starq2ltechn, crownltechn). I don't have plans to > introduce support for any new Samsung sdm845 device except > starqltechn, but I guess we should extract common dtsi now to make > future contributions easier. I think I should rename common dtsi file > to '$soc-$vendor-common.dtsi', like others device trees doing now File can be easily renamed later, but if additional devices are not mainlined we will always need to deal with almost empty DTS. Best regards, Krzysztof
