On 17/06/2022 04:01, Dzmitry Sankouski wrote: > New device support - Samsung S9 (SM-G9600) phone > What works: > - simple framebuffer > - storage (both main and sdcard) > - ramoops > > Signed-off-by: Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes for v2: > - rebase on Linus's master branch > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile | 1 + > .../dts/qcom/sdm845-samsung-starqltechn.dts | 45 ++ > .../dts/qcom/sdm845-samsung-starqltechn.dtsi | 448 ++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 494 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-samsung-starqltechn.dts > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-samsung-starqltechn.dtsi > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile > index 2f8aec2cc6db..85140db507b6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile > @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sdm845-db845c.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sdm845-mtp.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sdm845-oneplus-enchilada.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sdm845-oneplus-fajita.dtb > +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sdm845-samsung-starqltechn.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sdm845-sony-xperia-tama-akari.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sdm845-sony-xperia-tama-akatsuki.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sdm845-sony-xperia-tama-apollo.dtb > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-samsung-starqltechn.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-samsung-starqltechn.dts > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..53bb2ebf0061 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-samsung-starqltechn.dts > @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * SDM845 Samsung S9 (SM-G9600) (starqltechn) specific device tree > + * > + * Copyright (c) 2020, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. > + */ > + > +#include "sdm845-samsung-starqltechn.dtsi" > + > +/ { > + model = "Samsung S9 SM-G9600"; > + compatible = "samsung,starqltechn", "qcom,sdm845"; Missing documentation. I guess you should rebase on my series adding compatibles for sdm845. Bjorn, can we get my series merged? It's really more and more DTs needing it. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220521164550.91115-7-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/ > + > + chosen { > + #address-cells = <2>; > + #size-cells = <2>; > + ranges; > + bootargs = "console=tty1 loglevel=15 clk_ignore_unused PMOS_NO_OUTPUT_REDIRECT"; This should not be in DTS. Especially debugging stuff... console should be selected by stdout-path. > + framebuffer: framebuffer@9D400000 { lowercase addresses everywhere > + compatible = "simple-framebuffer"; > + reg = <0 0x9D400000 0 (2960 * 1440 * 4)>;//2400000 > + width = <1440>; > + height = <2960>; > + stride = <(1440 * 4)>; > + format = "a8r8g8b8"; > + }; > + }; > + > + Just one blank line. > + reserved-memory { > + framebuffer_region@9d400000 { > + reg = <0x0 0x9d400000 0x0 0x02400000>; > + no-map; > + }; > + > + ramoops@A1300000 { lowercase hex. In entire file. > + compatible = "ramoops"; > + reg = <0x0 0xa1300000 0x0 0x100000>; > + record-size = <0x40000>; > + console-size = <0x40000>; > + ftrace-size = <0x40000>; > + pmsg-size = <0x40000>; > + }; > + }; > +}; > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-samsung-starqltechn.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-samsung-starqltechn.dtsi > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..1d640d88c61a > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-samsung-starqltechn.dtsi Why do you have DTSI for one DTS? > @@ -0,0 +1,448 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * SDM845 Samsung S9 (SM-G9600) (starqltechn / star2qltechn) common device tree source > + * > + * Copyright (c) 2020, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. > + */ > + > +/dts-v1/; > + > +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> > +#include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h> > +#include "sdm845.dtsi" > + > +/ { > + chassis-type = "handset"; > + > + vph_pwr: vph-pwr-regulator { > + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > + regulator-name = "vph_pwr"; > + regulator-min-microvolt = <3700000>; > + regulator-max-microvolt = <3700000>; > + }; > + > + /* > + * Apparently RPMh does not provide support for PM8998 S4 because it > + * is always-on; model it as a fixed regulator. > + */ > + vreg_s4a_1p8: pm8998-smps4 { Consistent naming. Please apply all comments from your other patchset... > + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > + regulator-name = "vreg_s4a_1p8"; > + > + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>; > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>; > + > + regulator-always-on; > + regulator-boot-on; > + > + vin-supply = <&vph_pwr>; > + }; > +}; > + > + One blank line. > +&apps_rsc { > + pm8998-rpmh-regulators { > + compatible = "qcom,pm8998-rpmh-regulators"; > + qcom,pmic-id = "a"; > + Best regards, Krzysztof