Hi Jakub, Thank you for your reply! > From: Jakub Kicinski, Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2022 10:07 AM > > On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:46:34 +0000 Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > > I thought we have 2 types about the use of the treewide: > > 1) Completely depends on multiple subsystems and/or > > change multiple subsystems in a patch. > > 2) Convenient for review. > > > > This patch series type is the 2) above. However, should I use > > treewide for the 1) only? > > I thought "treewide" means you're changing something across the tree. > If you want to get a new platform reviewed I'd just post the patches > as RFC without any prefix in the subject. But I could be wrong. Using RFC is reasonable, I think. I'll use this at next time. Thanks! > My main point (which I did a pretty poor job of actually making) > was that for the networking driver to be merged it needs to get > posted separately. I'll separate patches for the networking driver on v3 patch. Best regards, Yoshihiro Shimoda
