On 20/09/2022 16:01, Jason-JH.Lin wrote:
> For previous MediaTek SoCs, such as MT8173, there are 2 display HW
> pipelines binding to 1 mmsys with the same power domain, the same
> clock driver and the same mediatek-drm driver.
>
> For MT8195, VDOSYS0 and VDOSYS1 are 2 display HW pipelines binding to
> 2 different power domains, different clock drivers and different
> mediatek-drm drivers.
>
> Moreover, Hardware pipeline of VDOSYS0 has these components: COLOR,
> CCORR, AAL, GAMMA, DITHER. They are related to the PQ (Picture Quality)
> and they makes VDOSYS0 supports PQ function while they are not
> including in VDOSYS1.
>
> Hardware pipeline of VDOSYS1 has the component ETHDR (HDR related
> component). It makes VDOSYS1 supports the HDR function while it's not
> including in VDOSYS0.
>
> To summarize0:
> Only VDOSYS0 can support PQ adjustment.
> Only VDOSYS1 can support HDR adjustment.
>
> Therefore, we need to separate these two different mmsys hardwares to
> 2 different compatibles for MT8195.
>
> Fixes: 81c5a41d10b9 ("dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: add mt8195 SoC binding")
> Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml
> index 6ad023eec193..df9184b6772c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml
> @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ properties:
> - const: mediatek,mt7623-mmsys
> - const: mediatek,mt2701-mmsys
> - const: syscon
> + - items:
> + - const: mediatek,mt8195-vdosys0
> + - const: mediatek,mt8195-mmsys
> + - const: syscon
and why mediatek,mt8195-mmsys is kept as non-deprecated?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
