Hi Jakub, On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:14:53AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 08:04:13 -0700 Colin Foster wrote: > > My plan was to start sending RFCs on the internal copper phys and get > > some feedback there. I assume there'll be a couple rounds and I don't > > expect to hit this next release (if I'm being honest). > > > > So I'll turn this question around to the net people: would a round or > > two of RFCs that don't cleanly apply to net-next be acceptable? Then I > > could submit a patch right after the next merge window? I've been > > dragging these patches around for quite some time, I can do it for > > another month :-) > > FWIW RFC patches which don't apply cleanly seem perfectly fine to me. > Perhaps note the base in the cover letter for those who may want to > test them. > > We can pull Lee's branch (thanks!) if it turns out the code is ready > long before the MW. I'll quote Vladimir Oltean: "It mostly looks ok to me" https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220912155234.ds73xpn5ijjq3iif@skbuf/ If you pull in Lee's branch I would certainly make use of it in the next 2-3 weeks. I would probably send out the patch set for review in a day or two.
