Hi Andrew, Thank you for your review! > From: Andrew Lunn, Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2022 9:16 AM > > > + ports { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + port@0 { > > + reg = <0>; > > + phy-handle = <ða0>; > > + phy-mode = "sgmii"; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + etha0: ethernet-phy@0 { > > + reg = <1>; > > reg = 1 means you should have @1. I'll fix it. > > + compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45"; > > + }; > > + }; > > You are mixing Ethernet and MDIO properties in one node. Past > experience says this is a bad idea, particularly when you have > switches involved. I would suggest you add an mdio container: > > > > + port@1 { > > + reg = <1>; > > + phy-handle = <ða1>; > > + phy-mode = "sgmii"; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > mdio { > > + etha1: ethernet-phy@1 { > > + reg = <2>; > > + compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45"; > > + }; > }; > > + }; Thank you for the suggestion. I'll fix it. > > + port@2 { > > + reg = <2>; > > + phy-handle = <ða2>; > > + phy-mode = "sgmii"; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + etha2: ethernet-phy@2 { > > + reg = <3>; > > + compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45"; > > + }; > > + }; > > I find it interesting you have PHYs are address 1, 2, 3, even though > they are on individual busses. Why pay for the extra pullup/down > resistors when they could all have the same address? I don't know why. But, the board really configured such PHY addresses... Best regards, Yoshihiro Shimoda > Andrew