On 09/09/2022 05:20, Chengci.Xu wrote: >>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause) */ >> >> Why do you license it under BSD-3 clause? >> > > A mediatek internal wiki suggest me use "BSD-3-Clause" without detial > reason. May be it is not suitable for this file. > > If you don't approve of this, I can change this license to "GPL-2.0- > only OR BSD-2-Clause", which is perferred by DT bindings file according > to "submitting-patches.rst". > > Do you think "BSD-2-Clause" is OK? Or could you kindly share me another > proper license? Please switch to "GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause", which is preferred for bindings. Best regards, Krzysztof
