On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:29 PM, PERIER Romain <romain.perier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> What I'm more concerned about is the semantics of the property. What >> do the generic code paths gain by standardizing this property? Is it >> expected that > > We really need to come up with a standard property for this and document > it rather than continuing to add individual device specific properties > each time a driver adds poweroff capability, > all doing the same thing (a lot of regulators driver, mfd drivers, soc > specific drivers, power drivers already do that, that's very redudant) > . This is a simple unification logic. Yes, it's fine. I accidentally left that paragraph in when I sent my reply. I started writing that concern, and then thought better of it. The property is fine. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
