Hi Grant, Am Freitag, 10. Oktober 2014, 12:47:08 schrieb Grant Likely: > What I'm more concerned about is the semantics of the property. What > do the generic code paths gain by standardizing this property? Is it > expected that [seems to be missing some text in the original mail] We currently see an influx of system-power-controller variants. While in the past it only was ti,system-power-controller there is now already maxim,system-power-controller rockchip,system-power-controller Romain's work would introduce "active-semi,system-power-controller", I have a "netronix,system-power-controller" sitting in some distant tree and there may be more already waiting somewhere. So in the worst case I'd think you could expect such a property for every pmic-vendor in vendor-prefixes.txt ... as it seems to be a quite common use- case these days to have the pmic handle system power on its own. Heiko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
