On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 01:51:45PM -0500, Andrew Halaney wrote: > Hi, > > This is my poor attempt at getting devicetree validation into a better > state for qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml. This is a follow-up to Johan's > request for this over here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/Yw8EE%2FESDUnIRf8P@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > In particular, I'm not certain patch 1 is the correct way to handle > things, and patch 2 makes validation too wide for the *-supply nodes. > > I'd love any feedback here as I'm really not experienced in any of the > spaces (regulator, rpmh, or dt schema) so nit picking is welcomed. v2 posted over here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20220906201959.69920-1-ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx/
