On 02/09/2022 07:20, Joel Selvaraj wrote: > Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski, > >> The board compatibles are not that important for ABI yet this creates >> precedence, so I am against it. Simple renaming should not be a reason >> to change compatibles. > > So what should I do now? > 1. Retain "xiaomi,beryllium" for tianma and "xiaomi,beryllium-ebbg" for ebbg? > 2. If adding new compatible is not an issue, can I do > "xiaomi,beryllium-tianma", "xiaomi,beryllium", "qcom,sdm845" - for tianma > "xiaomi,beryllium-ebbg", "xiaomi,beryllium", "qcom,sdm845" - for ebbg > Both options work for me. I understand that boards are quite compatible and only the panel is different but the safest option (from any 3rd party users) is (1) above. If anyone has other preference, I am also ok. If not, then go with (1) above. Best regards, Krzysztof