Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-pmics: Remove reg entry for pmc8280c_lpg node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/09/2022 08:47, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On 9/5/22 12:52 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 03/09/2022 11:44, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>>> Commit eeca7d46217c ("arm64: dts: qcom: pm8350c: Drop PWM reg declaration")
>>> dropped PWM reg declaration for pm8350c pwm(s), but there is a leftover
>>> 'reg' entry inside the lpg/pwm node in sc8280xp dts file. Remove the same.
>>>
>>> While at it, also remove the unused unit address in the node
>>> label.
>>>
>>> Fixes: eeca7d46217c ("arm64: dts: qcom: pm8350c: Drop PWM reg declaration")
>>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-pmics.dtsi | 3 +--
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-pmics.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-pmics.dtsi
>>> index ae90b97aecb8..2e5cf55afdd5 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-pmics.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-pmics.dtsi
>>> @@ -60,9 +60,8 @@ pmc8280c_gpios: gpio@8800 {
>>>   			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>>   		};
>>>   
>>> -		pmc8280c_lpg: lpg@e800 {
>>> +		pmc8280c_lpg: lpg {
>>
>> I wonder why I did not see the errors when testing all DTSes for
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220828084341.112146-9-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> I did not see the error while running the 'make dtbs_check' locally, so 
> may be something to improve in 'make dtbs_check' infrastructure there.
> 
>> Anyway, it cannot be lpg - binding requires "pwm".
> 
> I think that should be a separate patch. It does not seem related to 
> this change anyways - which fixes eeca7d46217c . I will send a v2 soon.

You would be changing same line twice and eeca7d46217c is not going to
be backported, so I am no sure if there is benefit to make two patches.


Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux