On 27/08/2022 12:14, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>> Gesendet: Samstag, 27. August 2022 um 10:56 Uhr
>> Von: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> On 27/08/2022 11:50, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 26. August 2022 um 08:50 Uhr
>>>> Von: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> On 25/08/2022 22:38, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>>>>> From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts
>>>>> index 93d383b8be87..40b90c052634 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts
>>>>> @@ -86,6 +86,66 @@ vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys {
>>>>> vin-supply = <&dc_12v>;
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> + pcie30_avdd0v9: pcie30-avdd0v9 {
>>>>
>>>> Use consistent naming, so if other nodes have "regulator" suffix, use it
>>>> here as well.
>>>
>>> only these 3 new have the suffix:
>>>
>>> vcc3v3_pi6c_05: vcc3v3-pi6c-05-regulator
>>> vcc3v3_minipcie: vcc3v3-minipcie-regulator
>>> vcc3v3_ngff: vcc3v3-ngff-regulator
>>>
>>> so i would drop it there...
>>>
>>> so i end up with (including existing ones to compare):
>>>
>>> vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys
>>> vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys
>>> pcie30_avdd0v9: pcie30-avdd0v9
>>> pcie30_avdd1v8: pcie30-avdd1v8
>>> vcc3v3_pi6c_05: vcc3v3-pi6c-05
>>> vcc3v3_minipcie: vcc3v3-minipcie
>>> vcc3v3_ngff: vcc3v3-ngff
>>> vcc5v0_usb: vcc5v0_usb
>>> vcc5v0_usb_host: vcc5v0-usb-host
>>> vcc5v0_usb_otg: vcc5v0-usb-otg
>>>
>>> is this ok?
>>>
>>> maybe swap avdd* and pcie30 part to have voltage in front of function.
>>>
>>
>> I prefer all of them have regulator suffix. I think reasonable is also
>> to rename the old ones and then add new ones with suffix.
>
> ok, will change these to add -regulator in name (not label). and then rename the others in separate Patch outside of the series.
>
> so basicly here
> - pcie30_avdd0v9: pcie30-avdd0v9 {
> + pcie30_avdd0v9: pcie30-avdd0v9-regulator {
> - pcie30_avdd1v8: pcie30-avdd1v8 {
> + pcie30_avdd1v8: pcie30-avdd1v8-regulator {
>
> how about the swapping of pcie30 and the avddXvY? In Schematic they are named PCIE30_AVDD_0V9 / PCIE30_AVDD_1V8, so better leave this?
>
> avdd0v9-pcie30 will be more similar to the other regulators, but inconsistent with Schematic.
Does not matter to me - it is still a specific prefix, so whatever you
put there it's for you, not for me. Keeping something aligned to
schematic - even if not consistently named - makes sense to me.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
