On 25/08/2022 23:40, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> +static int lan9662_otp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
> + struct lan9662_otp *otp;
> +
> + otp = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*otp), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!otp)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + otp->dev = dev;
> + otp->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(otp->base))
> + return PTR_ERR(otp->base);
> +
> + otp_config.priv = otp;
> + otp_config.dev = dev;
> +
> + nvmem = devm_nvmem_register(dev, &otp_config);
> +
> + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(nvmem);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id lan9662_otp_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "microchip,lan9662-otp", },
> + { .compatible = "microchip,lan9668-otp", },
Why do you need two compatibles here? Your bindings are saying only one
is needed...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
