On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 02:23:03PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 09:16:02PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Maxime Ripard > >> <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:48:55PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> >> The Allwinner A80 is a new Cortex octo-core A7/A15 big.LITTLE SoC. > >> >> While it's processor cores and interconnecting bus are new, it > >> >> re-uses many peripherals found in earlier Allwinner SoCs. > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> > >> >> --- > >> >> arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 5 +++++ > >> >> arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c | 9 +++++++++ > >> >> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+) > >> >> > >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > >> >> index 1aaa1e1..72f222b 100644 > >> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > >> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > >> >> @@ -42,4 +42,9 @@ config MACH_SUN8I > >> >> select MFD_SUN6I_PRCM > >> >> select RESET_CONTROLLER > >> >> > >> >> +config MACH_SUN9I > >> >> + bool "Allwinner A80 (sun9i) SoCs support" > >> > > >> > With the new naming scheme, I wonder wether it makes sense to have the > >> > A80 displayed here and in the machine definition. > >> > >> I expect anything that falls under sun9i to be compatible, or a trimmed > >> down version. But that's just me. > > > > Well, compatible is a rather vague notion. They will be different for > > sure. Maybe not that different, but still. > > So what you're saying is we have a MACH_* Kconfig symbol for each SoC. > As we add or test drivers, we mark them as compatible by adding that > symbol to the DEPENDS part? > > I can live with that. No, what I'm saying is drop the A80 mention from the bool label, and only leave the family there. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature