Am Dienstag, dem 26.07.2022 um 17:07 +0200 schrieb Ulf Hansson: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 10:33, Martin Kepplinger > <martin.kepplinger@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > If for example the power-domains' power-supply node (regulator) > > needs > > interrupts to work, the current setup with noirq callbacks cannot > > work; for example a pmic regulator on i2c, when suspending, usually > > already > > times out during suspend_noirq: > > > > [ 41.024193] buck4: failed to disable: -ETIMEDOUT > > > > So fix system suspend and resume for these power-domains by using > > the > > "outer" suspend/resume callbacks instead. Tested on the imx8mq- > > librem5 board, > > but by looking at the dts, this will fix imx8mq-evk and possibly > > many other > > boards too. > > > > This is designed so that genpd providers just say "this genpd needs > > interrupts" (by setting the flag) - without implying an > > implementation. > > > > Initially system suspend problems had been discussed at > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20211002005954.1367653-8-l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > which led to discussing the pmic that contains the regulators which > > serve as power-domain power-supplies: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/573166b75e524517782471c2b7f96e03fd93d175.camel@xxxxxxx/T/ > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/base/power/domain.c | 13 +++++++++++-- > > include/linux/pm_domain.h | 5 +++++ > > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c > > b/drivers/base/power/domain.c > > index 5a2e0232862e..58376752a4de 100644 > > --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c > > +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c > > @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ static const struct genpd_lock_ops > > genpd_spin_ops = { > > #define genpd_is_active_wakeup(genpd) (genpd->flags & > > GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP) > > #define genpd_is_cpu_domain(genpd) (genpd->flags & > > GENPD_FLAG_CPU_DOMAIN) > > #define genpd_is_rpm_always_on(genpd) (genpd->flags & > > GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON) > > +#define genpd_irq_on(genpd) (genpd->flags & > > GENPD_FLAG_IRQ_ON) > > > > static inline bool irq_safe_dev_in_sleep_domain(struct device > > *dev, > > const struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > > @@ -2065,8 +2066,15 @@ int pm_genpd_init(struct generic_pm_domain > > *genpd, > > genpd->domain.ops.runtime_suspend = genpd_runtime_suspend; > > genpd->domain.ops.runtime_resume = genpd_runtime_resume; > > genpd->domain.ops.prepare = genpd_prepare; > > - genpd->domain.ops.suspend_noirq = genpd_suspend_noirq; > > - genpd->domain.ops.resume_noirq = genpd_resume_noirq; > > + > > + if (genpd_irq_on(genpd)) { > > + genpd->domain.ops.suspend = genpd_suspend_noirq; > > + genpd->domain.ops.resume = genpd_resume_noirq; > > + } else { > > + genpd->domain.ops.suspend_noirq = > > genpd_suspend_noirq; > > + genpd->domain.ops.resume_noirq = > > genpd_resume_noirq; > > As we discussed previously, I am thinking that it may be better to > move to using genpd->domain.ops.suspend_late and > genpd->domain.ops.resume_early instead. Wouldn't that better be a separate patch (on top)? Do you really want me to change the current behaviour (default case) to from noirq to late? Then I'll resend this series with such a patch added. thanks, martin > > Beside this, I think the $subject patch looks good to me. > > [...] > > Kind regards > Uffe
