Re: [PATCH v3 10/19] dt-bindings: clock: rockchip: Document RV1126 CRU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Jagan Teki (2022-08-18 05:41:23)
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  clock-names:
> +    const: xin24m
> +
> +  rockchip,grf:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> +    description:
> +      Phandle to the syscon managing the "general register files" (GRF),
> +      if missing pll rates are not changeable, due to the missing pll
> +      lock status.
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - "#clock-cells"
> +  - "#reset-cells"

Why aren't clocks required?

> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    cru: clock-controller@ff490000 {
> +      compatible = "rockchip,rv1126-cru";
> +      reg = <0xff490000 0x1000>;
> +      rockchip,grf = <&grf>;
> +      #clock-cells = <1>;
> +      #reset-cells = <1>;

Can you add 'clocks' property to the binding?




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux