Hi, * Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx> [220815 18:16]: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 3:33 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > * Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx> [220813 00:45]: > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 2:49 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > * Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx> [220810 05:54]: > > > > > Tony, > > > > > > > > > > This should handle the odd case of the child being the supplier of the > > > > > parent. Can you please give this a shot? I want to make sure the cycle > > > > > detection code handles this properly and treats it like it's NOT a cycle. > > > > > > > > Yup, this series works for me, so feel free to add: > > > > > > > > Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Thanks for testing! > > > > > > Btw, out of curiosity, how many different boards did you test this on? > > > IIRC you had an issue only in one board, right? Not to say I didn't > > > break anything else, I'm just trying to see how much confidence we > > > have on this series so far. I'm hoping the rest of the folks I listed > > > in the email will get around to testing this series. > > > > Sorry if I was not clear earlier. The issue affects several generations > > of TI 32-bit SoCs at least, not just one board. > > But this series fixes the issues for all of them or are you still > seeing some broken boot with this series? Yes. However, I'm now getting confused what exactly you're proposing to fix the regressions for v6.0-rc series. I'd like to see just the fixes series for v6.0-rc series. With proper fixes tags, and possibly reverts. Then discussing patches for Linux next can be done based on the fixes :) Regards, Tony
