On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 2:49 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx> [220810 05:54]: > > Tony, > > > > This should handle the odd case of the child being the supplier of the > > parent. Can you please give this a shot? I want to make sure the cycle > > detection code handles this properly and treats it like it's NOT a cycle. > > Yup, this series works for me, so feel free to add: > > Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for testing! Btw, out of curiosity, how many different boards did you test this on? IIRC you had an issue only in one board, right? Not to say I didn't break anything else, I'm just trying to see how much confidence we have on this series so far. I'm hoping the rest of the folks I listed in the email will get around to testing this series. -Saravana > I have some concerns though on how do we get a working -rc1 with the > earlier series applied? See the comments in the last patch of this > series. I tried to reply, but not sure if it helps. We'll continue the discussion there. -Saravana
