> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2022年8月17日 17:47
> To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx;
> pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; festevam@xxxxxxxxx;
> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>; Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>; Jacky Bai
> <ping.bai@xxxxxxx>; sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx;
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] arm64: dts: imx8ulp: Add the fec support
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 12:38:52AM +1000, wei.fang@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add the fec support on i.MX8ULP platforms.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > V2 change:
> > Remove the external clocks which is related to specific board.
> > V3 change:
> > No change.
> > V4 Change:
> > Add Reviewed-by tag.
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
> > index 60c1b018bf03..3e8a1e4f0fc2 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ / {
> > #size-cells = <2>;
> >
> > aliases {
> > + ethernet0 = &fec;
> > gpio0 = &gpiod;
> > gpio1 = &gpioe;
> > gpio2 = &gpiof;
> > @@ -365,6 +366,16 @@ usdhc2: mmc@298f0000 {
> > bus-width = <4>;
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> > +
> > + fec: ethernet@29950000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-fec", "fsl,imx6ul-fec",
> > +"fsl,imx6q-fec";
>
> Since imx8ulp-fec is compatible with imx6ul-fec, what's the point of having
> imx6q-fec in there? It can be dropped, I guess?
>
Actually, I did drop this in version 1. But when I added the imx8ulp compatible
property to the fsl,fec.yaml, the maintainer expected imx8ulp to be compatible
with imx6ul and with imx6q. The patch of fsl,fec.yaml as follows:
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,fec.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,fec.yaml
@@ -58,6 +58,11 @@ properties:
- fsl,imx8qxp-fec
- const: fsl,imx8qm-fec
- const: fsl,imx6sx-fec
+ - items:
+ - enum:
+ - fsl,imx8ulp-fec
+ - const: fsl,imx6ul-fec
+ - const: fsl,imx6q-fec
For compliant with the fsl,fec.yaml, so I added the imx6q-fec in the later
version. And the patch of the fsl,fec.yaml has already applied to the
upstream kernel. Therefore, I think it does not matter if the imx6q-fec is
added.
> Shawn
>
> > + reg = <0x29950000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 107 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + interrupt-names = "int0";
> > + fsl,num-tx-queues = <1>;
> > + fsl,num-rx-queues = <1>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > };
> >
> > gpioe: gpio@2d000080 {
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
