Hi Geert, On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 4:26 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Prabhakar, > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 11:48 AM Lad, Prabhakar > <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 10:31 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski > > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 27/07/2022 11:00, Lad, Prabhakar wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 9:53 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski > > > > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On 26/07/2022 20:06, Lad Prabhakar wrote: > > > >>> Ignore the ARM renesas.yaml schema if the board is RZ/Five SMARC EVK > > > >>> (RISC-V arch). > > > >>> > > > >>> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >>> --- > > > >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/renesas.yaml | 9 +++++++++ > > > >>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > > >>> > > > >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/renesas.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/renesas.yaml > > > >>> index ff80152f092f..f646df1a23af 100644 > > > >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/renesas.yaml > > > >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/renesas.yaml > > > >>> @@ -9,6 +9,15 @@ title: Renesas SH-Mobile, R-Mobile, and R-Car Platform Device Tree Bindings > > > >>> maintainers: > > > >>> - Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > > >>> > > > >>> +# We want to ignore this schema if the board is of RISC-V arch > > > >>> +select: > > > >>> + not: > > > >>> + properties: > > > >>> + compatible: > > > >>> + contains: > > > >>> + items: > > > >>> + - const: renesas,r9a07g043f01 > > > >> > > > >> Second issue - why not renesas,r9a07g043? > > > >> > > > > We have two R9A07G043 SOC'S one is based on ARM64 and other on RISC-V. > > > > > > > > RZ/G2UL ARM64: > > > > Type-1 Part Number: R9A07G043U11GBG#BC0 > > > > Type-2 Part Number: R9A07G043U12GBG#BC0 > > > > > > > > RZ/Five RISCV: > > > > 13 x 13 mm Package Part Number: R9A07G043F01GBG#BC0 > > > > > > > > So to differentiate in ARM schema I am using renesas,r9a07g043f01. > > > > > > What is the point to keep then r9a07g043 fallback? The two SoCs are not > > > compatible at all, so they must not use the same fallback. > > > > > Agreed, I wanted to keep it consistent with what was done with ARM64 > > (since both the SoCs shared R9A07G043 part number). > > > > Geert - What are your thoughts on the above? > > "renesas,r9a07g043" is the CPU-less SoC base containing I/O devices. > "renesas,r9a07g043f01", "renesas,r9a07g043u11", and > "renesas,r9a07g043u12" are SoCs built by integrating one or more > RV64 or ARM64 CPU cores and the related interrupt controllers with > the CPU-less SoC base. > That's bang on! which I missed to convenience the DT maintainers. Cheers, Prabhakar
