On 27/07/2022 11:00, Lad, Prabhakar wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 9:53 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 26/07/2022 20:06, Lad Prabhakar wrote: >>> Ignore the ARM renesas.yaml schema if the board is RZ/Five SMARC EVK >>> (RISC-V arch). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/renesas.yaml | 9 +++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/renesas.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/renesas.yaml >>> index ff80152f092f..f646df1a23af 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/renesas.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/renesas.yaml >>> @@ -9,6 +9,15 @@ title: Renesas SH-Mobile, R-Mobile, and R-Car Platform Device Tree Bindings >>> maintainers: >>> - Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> +# We want to ignore this schema if the board is of RISC-V arch >>> +select: >>> + not: >>> + properties: >>> + compatible: >>> + contains: >>> + items: >>> + - const: renesas,r9a07g043f01 >> >> Second issue - why not renesas,r9a07g043? >> > We have two R9A07G043 SOC'S one is based on ARM64 and other on RISC-V. > > RZ/G2UL ARM64: > Type-1 Part Number: R9A07G043U11GBG#BC0 > Type-2 Part Number: R9A07G043U12GBG#BC0 > > RZ/Five RISCV: > 13 x 13 mm Package Part Number: R9A07G043F01GBG#BC0 > > So to differentiate in ARM schema I am using renesas,r9a07g043f01. What is the point to keep then r9a07g043 fallback? The two SoCs are not compatible at all, so they must not use the same fallback. Best regards, Krzysztof
