From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx>
The device bindings shouldn't put any constraints on the regulator-name
property specified in the generic bindings. This allows using arbitrary
and descriptive names for the regulators.
Suggested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 7ae9e3a6bf3f ("dt-bindings: regulator: add pca9450 regulator yaml")
Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml | 11 -----------
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml
index b539781e39aa..835b53302db8 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml
@@ -47,12 +47,6 @@ properties:
description:
Properties for single LDO regulator.
- properties:
- regulator-name:
- pattern: "^LDO[1-5]$"
- description:
- should be "LDO1", ..., "LDO5"
-
unevaluatedProperties: false
"^BUCK[1-6]$":
@@ -62,11 +56,6 @@ properties:
Properties for single BUCK regulator.
properties:
- regulator-name:
- pattern: "^BUCK[1-6]$"
- description:
- should be "BUCK1", ..., "BUCK6"
-
nxp,dvs-run-voltage:
$ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"
minimum: 600000
--
2.37.1
