On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 12:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 27/07/2022 08:52, Jagan Teki wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 19:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski > > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On 26/07/2022 15:44, Jagan Teki wrote: > >>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 at 02:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski > >>> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 23/07/2022 22:43, Jagan Teki wrote: > >>>>> Add power-domain header for RV1126 SoC from description in TRM. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> --- > >>>>> include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>>>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) > >>>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h > >>>>> > >>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h > >>>>> new file mode 100644 > >>>>> index 000000000000..f15930ff06f7 > >>>>> --- /dev/null > >>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h > >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ > >>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > >>>> > >>>> Dual license and a blank line, please. > >>> > >>> Yes, all rockchip power includes (at least here) are GPL-2.0 what is > >>> the issue with it? > >> > >> The headers are part of bindings and all bindings should be dual > >> licensed, so they can be used in other projects. > >> > >> Of course if copyright holder does not agree to release it on BSD, then > >> it would be fine as exception. Also would be fine from us not to accept > >> such bindings. :) > > > > I don't hold anything here to use dual-licensing. The only thing I'm > > wondering here is none of the rockchip power includes (which are > > merged) are using dual-licensing they simply have GPL-2.0 which is > > used in BSP. Let me know what you suggest? > > Hm, I think you asked this above and I answered that dual license should > be used. Maybe we misunderstand each other? Sorry, I'm asking again as I'm liable to change the license here or not. > > Do you include in this header any work which cannot be licensed on BSD > (e.g. is derivative of existing GPL-2 work)? Yes, it is from BSP https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/blob/develop-4.19/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h Thanks, Jagan.
