On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 11:24:54AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 01 October 2014 23:29:41 Beniamino Galvani wrote: > > > > +static const char * const m8_common_board_compat[] = { > > + "amlogic,meson8", > > + NULL, > > +}; > > + > > DT_MACHINE_START(AML8726_MX, "Amlogic Meson6 platform") > > .dt_compat = m6_common_board_compat, > > MACHINE_END > > > > +DT_MACHINE_START(MESON8, "Amlogic Meson8 platform") > > + .dt_compat = m8_common_board_compat, > > +MACHINE_END > > > > I'd just add the meson8 string to the m6_common_board_compat list and > rename it. >From what I've seen so far the two families are very similar and share most of the IP cores, so a unique DT machine is a good idea. Does the MACH_MESON8 Kconfig symbol still make sense or can I drop it and rename MACH_MESON6 to MACH_MESON? Beniamino -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html