On 19/07/2022 11:59, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 at 12:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 18/07/2022 17:38, Christian Marangi wrote: >>> Reorganize node order and sort them by address. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> >>> This was picked from for-next qcom branch [1]. Reorganize dtsi as requested. >>> >>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/qcom/linux.git/?h=for-next >> >> If this is picked by qcom branch, no need to resend it. >> >> I don't see value in such reshuffle. Reviewing is not possible and you >> did not mention tests (results should be equal). > > The value is usual for all the cleanups: make it follow the > established practice. Are you sure this is established practice? New DTSI files (see SC8280XP, sm8450 although sc7280 looked ordered) do not always follow it, so why imposing it for existing code? Such reshuffle can cause conflicts thus stops parallel development. Review is close to impossible... Best regards, Krzysztof
