On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 04:35:22PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 09:12:28AM -0500, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 03:13:38PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > The two single-port SC8280XP USB controllers do not have an hs_phy_irq
> > > interrupt. Instead they have a pwr_event interrupt which is distinct
> > > from the former and not yet supported by the driver.
> > >
> > > Fix the USB node interrupt names so that they match the devicetree
> > > binding.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 152d1faf1e2f ("arm64: dts: qcom: add SC8280XP platform")
> > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 12 ++++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> > > index 45cc7d714fd2..4a7aa9992f3a 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> > > @@ -1875,8 +1875,10 @@ usb_0: usb@a6f8800 {
> > > <&pdc 14 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
> > > <&pdc 15 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
> > > <&pdc 138 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > - interrupt-names = "hs_phy_irq", "dp_hs_phy_irq",
> > > - "dm_hs_phy_irq", "ss_phy_irq";
> > > + interrupt-names = "pwr_event",
> > > + "dp_hs_phy_irq",
> > > + "dm_hs_phy_irq",
> > > + "ss_phy_irq";
> > >
> > > power-domains = <&gcc USB30_PRIM_GDSC>;
> > >
> > > @@ -1925,8 +1927,10 @@ usb_1: usb@a8f8800 {
> > > <&pdc 12 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
> > > <&pdc 13 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
> > > <&pdc 136 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > - interrupt-names = "hs_phy_irq", "dp_hs_phy_irq",
> > > - "dm_hs_phy_irq", "ss_phy_irq";
> > > + interrupt-names = "pwr_event",
> > > + "dp_hs_phy_irq",
> > > + "dm_hs_phy_irq",
> > > + "ss_phy_irq";
> >
> > For this specific change to pwr_event:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > That being said, I was reviewing this against the (fairly old)
> > downstream release I have, and the IRQs defined there look like this:
> >
> > interrupts-extended = <&pdc 12 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > <&intc GIC_SPI 811 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > <&pdc 136 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > <&pdc 13 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > interrupt-names = "dp_hs_phy_irq", "pwr_event_irq",
> > "ss_phy_irq", "dm_hs_phy_irq";
> >
> > The part I want to highlight is that the "pwr_event" irq downstream maps
> > to <&intc GIC_SPI 811 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, but the current upstream
> > devicetree I'm looking at has it mapped to <&intc GIC_SPI 136 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>
> >
> > Do you happen to have any source you can also check to confirm if this
> > is a bug or not?
>
> Good catch! I believe this is another copy-paste error when creating
> base dtsi based on some vendor source (or perhaps an error carried over
> from an earlier version).
>
> The vendor devicetree I have access to also has 811 here, which matches
> the pattern for usb_0 (dwc3 interrupt + 1).
>
> Do you mind if I fold a fix for that into a v2 of this patch?
>
> Thanks for reviewing!
Sounds good, feel free to add my R-B with that change as well!
>
> Johan
>
