Am 13.07.22 um 10:15 schrieb Frieder Schrempf:
> Am 13.07.22 um 09:52 schrieb Heiko Thiery:
>> Hi Frieder,
>>
>> Am Mi., 13. Juli 2022 um 09:41 Uhr schrieb Frieder Schrempf <frieder@xxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Use upper case PMIC regulator names to comply with the bindings.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> .../freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n801x-som.dtsi | 22 +++++++++----------
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n801x-som.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n801x-som.dtsi
>>> index 2d0661cce89b..2e3d51bbf92e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n801x-som.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n801x-som.dtsi
>>> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ pca9450: pmic@25 {
>>>
>>> regulators {
>>> reg_vdd_soc: BUCK1 {
>>> - regulator-name = "buck1";
>>> + regulator-name = "BUCK1";
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better to use the real signal or voltage rail names
>> used in the schematics?
>
> Sounds like a good idea, thanks! I will try to include in the next
> version of this patchset.
On the other hand, the bindings stipulate that the regulator-names
should be "^BUCK[1-6]$" and "^LDO[1-5]$". But I admit these names are
not really useful and maybe the bindings should be changed to allow
arbitrary names?
