Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> 於 2022年7月8日 週五 凌晨1:20寫道：
>
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2022 22:11:42 +0800
> cy_huang <u0084500@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add Richtek rtq6056 supporting.
> >
> > It can be used for the system to monitor load current and power with 16-bit
> > resolution.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Various feedback inline.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> > ---
> > Since v5
> > - Fix kernel version text for ABI.
> >
> > Since v4
> > - Add '__aligned(8)' for timestamp member in buffer_trigger_handler function.
> > - Declare timestamp from 'int64_t' to more unified 's64'.
> >
> > Since v3
> > - Refine pm_runtime API calling order in 'read_channel' API.
> > - Fix vshunt wrong scale for divider.
> > - Refine the comment text.
> > - Use 'devm_add_action_or_reset' to decrease the code usage in probe
> > function.
> > - Use RUNTIME_PM_OPS to replace SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS.
> > - minor fix for the comma.
> > - Use pm_ptr to replace the direct assigned pm_ops.
> >
> > Since v2
> > - Rename file from 'rtq6056-adc' to 'rtq6056'.
> > - Refine the ABI, if generic already defined it, remove it and check the channel
> > report unit.
> > - Add copyright text.
> > - include the correct header.
> > - change the property parsing name.
> > - To use iio_chan_spec address field.
> > - Refine each channel separate and shared_by_all.
> > - Use pm_runtime and pm_runtime_autosuspend.
> > - Remove the shutdown callback. From the HW suggestion, it's not recommended to
> > use battery as the power supply.
> > - Check all scale unit (voltage->mV, current->mA, power->milliWatt).
> > - Use the read_avail to provide the interface for attribute value list.
> > - Add comma for the last element in the const integer array.
> > - Refine each ADC label text.
> > - In read_label callback, replace snprintf to sysfs_emit.
> >
> > ---
> > .../ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-adc-rtq6056 | 6 +
> > drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig | 15 +
> > drivers/iio/adc/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/iio/adc/rtq6056.c | 651 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 673 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-adc-rtq6056
> > create mode 100644 drivers/iio/adc/rtq6056.c
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-adc-rtq6056 b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-adc-rtq6056
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..e89d15b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-adc-rtq6056
> > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> > +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_voltage0_integration_time
> > +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_voltage1_integration_time
> > +KernelVersion: 5.20
> > +Contact: cy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > +Description:
> > + Each voltage conversion time in uS
>
> Please move this entry to sysfs-bus-iio
>
> It's a natural extension of existing standard ABI so doesn't need to be in
> a driver specific documentation file.
>
> However, way back in patch 1 I gave feedback on why we don't normally use integration time
> for voltage channels and I thought you were changing this...
>
I didn't intend to change this. Just cannot find any suitable
attribute for this feature.
>From the IC interrnal, there's only one set of ADC.
And the conversion order is bus/shunt......, average sample count to
control the sample update interval.
That' why the sample frequency is calculated by one second to divide
[(bus_ct + shunt_ct) * average sample bit] (us)
If it's not suitable for this attribute, I think it's better to change
it as file attribute, not IIO channel attribute.
How do you think?
> ...
>
> > +static int rtq6056_adc_read_channel(struct rtq6056_priv *priv,
> > + struct iio_chan_spec const *ch,
> > + int *val)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> > + unsigned int addr = ch->address;
> > + unsigned int regval;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> > + ret = regmap_read(priv->regmap, addr, ®val);
> > + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> > + pm_runtime_put(dev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /* Power and VBUS is unsigned 16-bit, others are signed 16-bit */
> > + if (addr == RTQ6056_REG_BUSVOLT || addr == RTQ6056_REG_POWER)
> > + *val = regval;
> > + else
> > + *val = sign_extend32(regval, 16);
> > +
>
> One blank line only.
>
> > +
> > + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> > +}
> > +
> ...
>
>
> > +
> > +static int rtq6056_adc_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int val,
> > + int val2, long mask)
> > +{
> > + struct rtq6056_priv *priv = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +
> > + if (iio_buffer_enabled(indio_dev))
>
> This is racy as can enter buffered mode immediately after this check.
> Use iio_device_claim_direct_mode() to avoid any races around this.
>
for the shunt resistor attribute write, also?
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > +
> > + switch (mask) {
> > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME:
> > + return rtq6056_adc_set_conv_time(priv, chan, val);
> > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO:
> > + return rtq6056_adc_set_average(priv, val);
> > + default:
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +}
>
>
> > +
> > +static void rtq6056_remove(void *dev)
> > +{
> > + pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(dev);
> > + pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> > + pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
>
> There isn't anything here to push the device into a suspend state, so why
> does calling pm_runtime_set_suspended() make sense?
>
As I know, It is needed, at least 'pm_runtime_set_suspended' must be kept.
To think one case, adc is reading, module is removing.
Who will change the IC state to off?
pm_runtime is already disabled, the IC will be kept in 'active', right?
> > +}
> > +
> >
> > +
> > +static int rtq6056_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
> > +{
> > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> > + struct rtq6056_priv *priv;
> > + struct device *dev = &i2c->dev;
> > + struct regmap *regmap;
> > + unsigned int vendor_id, shunt_resistor_uohm;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!i2c_check_functionality(i2c->adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA))
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > + indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*priv));
> > + if (!indio_dev)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + priv = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > + priv->dev = dev;
> > + priv->vshuntct_us = priv->vbusct_us = 1037;
> > + priv->avg_sample = 1;
> > + i2c_set_clientdata(i2c, priv);
> > +
> > + regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(i2c, &rtq6056_regmap_config);
> > + if (IS_ERR(regmap))
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(regmap),
> > + "Failed to init regmap\n");
> > +
> > + priv->regmap = regmap;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_read(regmap, RTQ6056_REG_MANUFACTID, &vendor_id);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> > + "Failed to get manufacturer info\n");
> > +
> > + if (vendor_id != RTQ6056_VENDOR_ID)
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV,
> > + "Invalid vendor id 0x%04x\n", vendor_id);
> > +
> > + ret = devm_regmap_field_bulk_alloc(dev, regmap, priv->rm_fields,
> > + rtq6056_reg_fields, F_MAX_FIELDS);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to init regmap field\n");
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * By default, configure average sample as 1, bus and shunt conversion
> > + * timea as 1037 microsecond, and operating mode to all on.
> > + */
> > + ret = regmap_write(regmap, RTQ6056_REG_CONFIG, RTQ6056_DEFAULT_CONFIG);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> > + "Failed to enable continuous sensing\n");
> > +
> > + pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(dev, MSEC_PER_SEC);
> > + pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(dev);
> > + pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> > + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> > + pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>
> Look at whether you can use devm_pm_runtime_enable()
> Note it handles disabling autosuspend for you.
>
> When using runtime_pm() you want to ensure that the device works without
> runtime pm support being enabled. As such, you turn the device on before
> enabling runtime_pm() and (this is missing I think) turn it off after disabling
> runtime pm. So I'd expect a devm_add_action_or_reset() call to unwind
> setting the device into continuous sending above.
>
If so, I think it's better to configure the device keep in off state
in probe stage.
The calling order may need to be changed as below
devm_add_action_or_reset...
pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay
pm_runtime_use_auto_suspend
devm_pm_runtime_enable
> > +
> > + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, rtq6056_remove, dev);
>
> The callback naming is too generic. It should give some indication
> of what it is undoing (much of probe is handled by other devm_ callbacks).
>
How about to change the name to 'rtq6056_enter_shutdown_state'?
And in this function, to change the device state in shutdown with
'pm_runtime_set_suspended' API.
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /* By default, use 2000 micro-ohm resistor */
> > + shunt_resistor_uohm = 2000;
> > + device_property_read_u32(dev, "shunt-resistor-micro-ohms",
> > + &shunt_resistor_uohm);
> > +
> > + ret = rtq6056_set_shunt_resistor(priv, shunt_resistor_uohm);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> > + "Failed to init shunt resistor\n");
> > +
> > + indio_dev->name = "rtq6056";
> > + indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> > + indio_dev->channels = rtq6056_channels;
> > + indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(rtq6056_channels);
> > + indio_dev->info = &rtq6056_info;
> > +
> > + ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(dev, indio_dev, NULL,
> > + rtq6056_buffer_trigger_handler,
> > + NULL);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> > + "Failed to allocate iio trigger buffer\n");
> > +
> > + return devm_iio_device_register(dev, indio_dev);
> > +}
>
> > +
> > +static const struct dev_pm_ops rtq6056_pm_ops = {
> > + RUNTIME_PM_OPS(rtq6056_runtime_suspend, rtq6056_runtime_resume, NULL)
>
> Is there any reason we can't use these same ops to achieve at least some power
> saving in suspend? i.e. use DEFINE_RUNTIME_PM_OPS()
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Where can I find this?
>
> I have tidying this up in existing drivers on my todo list as I think it is almost
> always a good idea. Note this is why there isn't a define to create the
> particular combination you have here.
>
If there's no combination like as that one, why not unify it to
'_DEFINE_DEV_PM_OPS'?
> > +};
> > +
>
