Dne sobota, 02. julij 2022 ob 06:24:47 CEST je Samuel Holland napisal(a): > All of the sunxi SoCs since at least the A33 have a similar structure > for the MBUS and DRAM controller, but they all have minor differences in > MBUS port assignments and DRAM controller behavior. Give each SoC its > own compatible. Shouldn't be compatibles introduced when they are actually used either in driver or in DT file? Best regards, Jernej > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > .../bindings/arm/sunxi/allwinner,sun4i-a10-mbus.yaml | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi/allwinner,sun4i-a10-mbus.yaml > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi/allwinner,sun4i-a10-mbus.yaml > index 2b018feb56df..99566688d033 100644 > --- > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi/allwinner,sun4i-a10-mbus.yaml > +++ > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi/allwinner,sun4i-a10-mbus.yaml > @@ -29,10 +29,20 @@ properties: > compatible: > enum: > - allwinner,sun5i-a13-mbus > + - allwinner,sun8i-a33-mbus > + - allwinner,sun8i-a50-mbus > + - allwinner,sun8i-a83t-mbus > - allwinner,sun8i-h3-mbus > - allwinner,sun8i-r40-mbus > + - allwinner,sun8i-v3s-mbus > + - allwinner,sun8i-v536-mbus > + - allwinner,sun20i-d1-mbus > - allwinner,sun50i-a64-mbus > + - allwinner,sun50i-a100-mbus > - allwinner,sun50i-h5-mbus > + - allwinner,sun50i-h6-mbus > + - allwinner,sun50i-h616-mbus > + - allwinner,sun50i-r329-mbus > > reg: > minItems: 1
