On Sat, 25 Jun 2022 12:38:44 +0200
Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Go for the right property name that is documented in the bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@xxxxxxxxx>
Hi Marcus,
Series with more than 1 or 2 patches should always have a cover letter
(git format-patch --cover-letter) to provide some overview information
and allow for general comments on the series.
Also, whilst I know you are keen to move forwards quickly it is usually
a good idea to give more than 2 days for all reviews to come in on a series
and discussion of any questions to finish.
For instance, I just replied to your question to Andy on patch 2 and
that basically says your patch 2 in v2 is taking the wrong approach.
If you'd waited a few more days you'd have save on the noise by resolving
that before sending more patches.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v2:
> - Fallback to "device-addr" due to compatibility (Andy Shevchenko)
>
> drivers/iio/adc/mcp3911.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/mcp3911.c b/drivers/iio/adc/mcp3911.c
> index 1cb4590fe412..c5a0f19d7834 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/mcp3911.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/mcp3911.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,13 @@ static int mcp3911_config(struct mcp3911 *adc)
> u32 configreg;
> int ret;
>
> - device_property_read_u32(dev, "device-addr", &adc->dev_addr);
> + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "microchip,device-addr", &adc->dev_addr);
> +
> + /* Fallback to "device-addr" due to historical mismatch between
> + * dt-bindings and implementation
> + */
> + if (ret)
> + device_property_read_u32(dev, "device-addr", &adc->dev_addr);
> if (adc->dev_addr > 3) {
> dev_err(&adc->spi->dev,
> "invalid device address (%i). Must be in range 0-3.\n",
