On Sat, 25 Jun 2022 12:38:44 +0200
Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Go for the right property name that is documented in the bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@xxxxxxxxx>
Need a fixes tag so we know how far to back port this.
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v2:
> - Fallback to "device-addr" due to compatibility (Andy Shevchenko)
>
> drivers/iio/adc/mcp3911.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/mcp3911.c b/drivers/iio/adc/mcp3911.c
> index 1cb4590fe412..c5a0f19d7834 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/mcp3911.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/mcp3911.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,13 @@ static int mcp3911_config(struct mcp3911 *adc)
> u32 configreg;
> int ret;
>
> - device_property_read_u32(dev, "device-addr", &adc->dev_addr);
> + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "microchip,device-addr", &adc->dev_addr);
> +
> + /* Fallback to "device-addr" due to historical mismatch between
Multiline comment syntax should be
/*
* Fallabck to "...
* dt-...
` */
> + * dt-bindings and implementation
> + */
> + if (ret)
> + device_property_read_u32(dev, "device-addr", &adc->dev_addr);
> if (adc->dev_addr > 3) {
> dev_err(&adc->spi->dev,
> "invalid device address (%i). Must be in range 0-3.\n",
